13 worked answers · short steps first, explanations when you need them
Stop and Think
Textbook pages
Question Stop and Think 1
Sen quotes Eliot’s lines ‘Not fare well / But fare forward, voyagers’. Distinguish between ‘faring forward’ (Krishna’s position in the Gita) and ‘faring well’ (the position that Sen advocates).
Steps only
Contrast acting from duty with weighing the consequences of action.
Answer
'Faring forward' stresses carrying out one's duty; 'faring well' asks whether the results will benefit people or cause harm. Sen says both matter.
Question Stop and Think 2
Sen draws a parallel between the moral dilemma in the Krishna-Arjuna dialogue and J. R. Oppenheimer’s response to the nuclear explosion in 1945. What is the basis for this?
Steps only
Connect both examples through the tension between duty or achievement and harmful consequences.
Answer
Both raise the moral question of whether duty or technical success can justify severe harm caused by the action.
Question Stop and Think 3
Maitreyi asks, ‘What should I do with that by which I do not become immortal?’ What connection does Sen draw between this and his concept of economic development?
Steps only
Explain that income is a means and development should expand people's capabilities and well-being.
Answer
Like Maitreyi, Sen asks what wealth is for. Development should expand people's real freedoms and well-being, not measure success by income alone.
Question Stop and Think 4
Sen says the argumentative tradition has crossed barriers of gender, caste, class, and community. List the examples he cites.
Steps only
List women thinkers and leaders, working-class poets, anti-caste arguments, and Bhakti-Sufi voices.
Answer
Examples include Maitreyi, Gargi, Sarojini Naidu, Nellie Sengupta, Kabir, Dadu, Ravi-das, Sena, anti-caste voices in the epics, Buddhist and Jain writers, and Bhakti-Sufi poets.
Understanding the Text
Textbook pages
Question Understanding the Text 1
What is Sen’s interpretation of the positions taken by Krishna and Arjuna in the debate between them?
Steps only
Set out each position and explain that Sen believes the epic preserves both arguments.
Answer
Krishna stresses duty; Arjuna stresses the human cost. Sen says the Mahabharata takes both seriously, and Arjuna's concern is not fully dismissed.
Question Understanding the Text 2
What are the three major issues Sen discusses here in relation to India’s dialogic tradition?
Steps only
Name moral debate, participation across social groups, and public reasoning in democracy.
Answer
Sen discusses moral and philosophical debate, whose voices take part across social divisions, and public reasoning as a basis for democracy.
Question Understanding the Text 3
Sen has sought here to dispel some misconceptions about democracy in India. What are these misconceptions?
Steps only
State both misconceptions and Sen's balanced explanation.
Answer
Sen rejects the ideas that democracy was only a Western gift or that India alone is naturally suited to it; public reasoning has roots in many societies, including India.
Question Understanding the Text 4
How, according to Sen, has the tradition of public discussion and interactive reasoning helped the success of democracy in India?
Steps only
Connect open debate with citizens' ability to assess public choices and sustain democratic institutions.
Answer
Public debate lets people question authority and consider different views, helping democratic institutions take root and continue.
Talking about the Text
Textbook pages
Question Talking about the Text 1
Does Amartya Sen see argumentation as a positive or a negative value?
Steps only
Explain the benefits of reasoned debate and distinguish it from hostile quarrelling.
Answer
Sen values argument when it helps people test ideas and hear different views; he does not praise hostile quarrelling.
Question Talking about the Text 2
How is the message of the Gita generally understood and portrayed? What change in interpretation does Sen suggest?
Steps only
Describe the usual focus on duty and Sen's call to include Arjuna's concern for consequences.
Answer
The Gita is often read as a lesson in duty without attachment to results. Sen asks readers also to consider Arjuna's concern about harmful consequences.
Appreciation
Textbook pages
Question Appreciation
For each statement, give the supporting evidence in the essay: (i) Prolixity is not alien to India. (ii) Arguments are often substantive. (iii) Admiration for the Gita and Krishna’s arguments lasted in parts of European culture. (iv) There remains a powerful case for ‘faring well’, not just ‘forward’.
Steps only
Pair each statement with one or more examples Sen supplies.
Answer
(i) Menon's long UN speech and the lengthy epics.
(ii) The Krishna-Arjuna debate.
(iii) Praise by Humboldt, Isherwood, and Eliot.
(iv) Arjuna's concern and the devastation after the war.
Language Work
Textbook pages
Question Language Work I (a) and (b)
(a) List words in the essay related to using words, especially in speech. (b) Find other examples where Sen qualifies or softens a statement.
Steps only
Separate debate vocabulary from words that limit or qualify a claim.
Answer
Speech words include talk, speech, loquaciousness, dialogue, debate, argument, and disputation. Qualifiers include often, by and large, perhaps, and in some ways.
Question Language Work II Task
Examine the noun phrases in the three given sentences from the text.
Steps only
Identify each phrase's head noun, modifiers, and appositive or prepositional additions.
Answer
1. Head: head; 'the second woman' modifies it; 'of the Indian National Congress' adds information; 'Nellie Sengupta' renames it. 2. Heads: relation, distance; 'between income and achievement' completes them. 3. Head: basis; 'class' modifies it; the 'of' and 'in' phrases add details.